Question of the Week

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week – February 7th, 2020

Question of the Week: How do you respond to the claim that the Bible contradicts itself?

The key to addressing this question is to first clarify what is meant by contradiction. Most people use the word without understanding what it actually is. An additional detail is not a contradiction. A difference between two details is not a contradiction. And most importantly, misrepresenting two passages are not a contradiction. A contradiction is a violation of the first law of logic. If two things said in the same way and in the same sense cancel each other out, they can’t both be true. Once you pick up the bad habit, 99% of the “contradictions” end up just being confusion or deception on the part of the person claiming they are irreconcilable.

Example 1: Additional Detail
Was Jairus’ daughter dead or alive when he asked Jesus to heal her?
Luke 8:41-42: She was still alive and died along the way.
Matthew 9:18: She was dead and Jairus asked Jesus to raise her.
Answer: Matthew and Luke are two different people noting the same event. The only differences are the additions to detail Luke provides. Matthew remembers Jairus’ daughter died and asked Jesus to raise her. Luke includes the detail that she was sick and asked Jesus to heal her, then when a messenger told him she had died, he asked Jesus to raise her. (Where Matthew’s account starts)

Example 2: Difference Between Two Details
What was Sodom’s sin?
Luke 10:10-12: Inhospitality?
Jude 1:7: Sexual immorality?
Genesis 19:1-5: Sexual immorality?
Jeremiah 23:14: Adultery and Lies?
Answer: Where do any of these exclude the others? Are Sexually Immoral people always Hospitable? Are liars always hospitable? Are adulterers always honest? Are inhospitable people always sexually moral?

Example 3: Misrepresenting Two Passages
Does the Bible say to honor parents or to dishonor them?
Luke 9:59-62: Don’t honor parents
Exodus 20:12: Honor Parents
Answer: The saying, “Let me bury my father” doesn’t mean his dad died. He was saying that he’ll follow Jesus after his dad dies at some point in the distant future. Even if you didn’t understand the reference, it wouldn’t be reasonable to conclude Jesus was commanding someone to dishonor their father. The only objective command Jesus made was to follow Him.

A Reason For Hope is a ministry of Calvary Christian Fellowship of Tucson

Listen: Monday – Friday 5-6pm, on 106.3FM Reach Radio

Email your questions:

questionsforhope@gmail.com

Follow Twitter: @ScottR4HFollow on CCF Facebook: facebook.com/ccftucson
Watch our Frequently Asked Questions on GodTube or YouTube.

Download our A Reason For Hope App in the Google Play or Apple Stores!

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, January 31st, 2020

Question of the Week: Why does God promise joy when we follow Him, yet always leave me feeling unhappy?

Joy isn’t happiness. If you’re looking for joy, you first need to know what you’re looking for in order to recognize whether you have it or not. Joy is defined as hope fulfilled. It is a peace found through assurance and confidence that your hope isn’t being misplaced. The best example of this, as always, is Jesus when He was on the cross. According to Hebrews 12:2, Jesus went to the cross with joy. He wasn’t happy about the process, but the joy of having you and I with Him forever as a result of that action gave Him the confidence and peace to endure it. He trusted His Father to know what price needed to be paid for our salvation. From that faith, His reasons to trust the Father, He had joy. If you want to hear a more accurate promise of joy, hear what Paul promises those who rejoice in God.

Philippians 4:6-7: Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God; and the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.

As a result of a prayerful and thankful lifestyle, the peace of God will guard your heart and mind. That is joy. This peace passes all understanding. It can even take place when you’re not happy. Remember that happiness isn’t the pursuit of the Christian life. It isn’t even necessarily joy. They are simply results of having the true prize. That’s Jesus. If you have Him, you have peace. That’s real joy.

A Reason For Hope is a ministry of Calvary Christian Fellowship of Tucson

Listen: Monday – Friday 5-6pm, on 106.3FM Reach Radio

Email your questions:

questionsforhope@gmail.com

Follow Twitter: @ScottR4HFollow on CCF Facebook: facebook.com/ccftucson
Watch our Frequently Asked Questions on GodTube or YouTube.

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week – January 24th, 2020

Question of the Week: Is it true that the generation that saw Israel restored as a nation in 1948 will not pass away until Jesus’ return?

No. People who make any claim that sets any required period of time for the Rapture to occur in is denying a very plain reality when it comes to scripture. Jesus stated in Matthew 24:36-44 that no man knows the day or the hour of His coming. This is what is known as the doctrine of immanency. From the plain things of scripture, we remember these rules when interpreting other statements made in scripture. If what we aren’t certain of conflicts with what we can be certain of, then we need to revisit our interpretation. This claim about 1948 marking the generation that will not pass away is based on the parable of the fig tree that immediately precedes Jesus’ clarification that no man knows the day or the hour. The fig tree is rightly interpreted to be Israel on the basis of several Old Testament prophets, (Jeremiah Ezekiel, and Joel mainly), and that like a fig tree blossoming shows that harvest is coming soon, so the blossoming of the nation of Israel will mark the fulfillment of the End Times Jesus was speaking of to be at the doors. This is where the fork in the road appears. What is meant by “this generation” in the passage? Those who harmonize the doctrine of immanency with this claim say that a generation simply means the people of Israel will not pass away after being restored to their land. This is the position we would take. Those that claim a date for the rapture is being set interpret a generation in the other ways scripture claims a generation lasts. Genesis 6 claims it is 120 years. Psalm 90 claims it is 70 years or 80 if they have strength. The problem is that neither of these passages claim this is a biblical generation, nor is the point Jesus is trying to make in light of the clarification He immediately proceeds to make after stating this parable. Genesis 6 simply observed that unlike the long ages Adam’s generation lived to, man’s days will become progressively shorter to that point. From centuries to perhaps one century would constitute an average lifespan post-flood. Likewise, Psalm 90 is Moses observing a simple fact in a poetic context. Men live on average 70-80 years depending on health and circumstances. To say these passages are giving us a date for a biblical generation attribute a contradiction in scripture, as well as end up contradicting Jesus’ main point. If Moses’ generation is correct, then the Rapture should have happened two years ago at the time this article is being written. If Genesis’ generation is correct, then Jesus was wrong. The Rapture is going to happen in 2068. We CAN know the day and the hour of the Lord’s return. This statement is of course sarcastic. I have more reason to trust Jesus’ plain statements than reading into Psalms and Genesis a measurement of time that isn’t necessarily there.

A Reason For Hope is a ministry of Calvary Christian Fellowship of Tucson

Listen: Monday – Friday 5-6pm, on 106.3FM Reach Radio

Email your questions:

questionsforhope@gmail.com

Follow Twitter: @ScottR4HFollow on CCF Facebook: facebook.com/ccftucson
Watch our Frequently Asked Questions on GodTube or YouTube.

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week – January 17th, 2020

Question of the Week: What is meant in Ezekiel 3:18 about the blood of the wicked being required by his hand?
Jesus observed that greater responsibility also includes greater consequences for negligence. To him whom much is given, much shall be required. This passage is affirming that same reality 600 years prior. Ezekiel, who was a prophet of God to the nation of Israel during their time in captivity in Babylon, stood alongside Jeremiah and Daniel constantly calling them back to a relationship with God. The reason they were in captivity in the first place was the eventual consequence of rejecting that relationship for 700 years. God warned them and they didn’t listen. The only ones they had to blame were themselves. They didn’t listen and their blood, i.e. the consequences of their decisions, was on their own hands. Ezekiel was the most current of a long line of prophets who spoke to Israel of these very warnings to avoid consequences and receive blessings. This opportunity also came with a price. Ezekiel knew what would happen if Israel continued to reject God. Once they heard these warnings, it would be their fault if they ignored them or not. However, if Ezekiel didn’t warn Israel and ignored God himself, then Israel would still pay for their crimes. Ezekiel as an individual, would also be responsible for not sharing the knowledge he was given above everyone else. The reason for this interpretation is found by reading the entire passage. Ezekiel’s conversation with God about this matter didn’t begin and end at verse 18. The full context of Ezekiel 3 begins at first 1 and ends at verse 27. Two illustrations are given. Ezekiel is commanded to eat a book and immediate goes on to explain that this was him being given the Word of the Lord to share with Israel. Ezekiel then is called a watchmen, who would be held responsible if he didn’t warn the city of an approaching army. His higher position would see that approaching army and give him the knowledge meant to be shared. The city would be attacked either way, but he would be responsible for the lives lost given the city was less prepared as a direct result of his negligence. Much like Jeremiah’s ministry, Ezekiel’s warnings largely fell on deaf ears. The benefit to Ezekiel would be that he wouldn’t be held responsible for not warning them. Jesus further affirmed this understanding of evangelism when sending out the 70 disciples to prepare people for His arrival. If they rejected them, then they were to shake off the dust from their shoes and inform them exactly what they were rejecting. The Kingdom of God. The takeaway is that even if people don’t listen, our responsibility from God is to faithfully inform them anyway so our consciences can be clear on the matter.

A Reason For Hope is a ministry of Calvary Christian Fellowship of Tucson

Listen: Monday – Friday 5-6pm, on 106.3FM Reach Radio

Email your questions:

questionsforhope@gmail.com

Follow Twitter: @ScottR4HFollow on CCF Facebook: facebook.com/ccftucson
Watch our Frequently Asked Questions on GodTube or YouTube.

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week – 1/10/2020

Question of the Week: How do we know that the people in the Bible like David actually existed? Could these all just be fictional stories meant to communicate deeper truths?

The plain answer to the second question is no according to the Bible itself. The Old and New Testament are both organized into three sections; History, Poetry, and Prophecy. While David did write poetry and present scenarios and descriptions that weren’t meant to be taken literally, we conclude that by where we find them in the Bible itself. The historical sections concerning David’s life give us everything we’d expect from a historical document. Those things are;
1. People, places, and things that actually existed: When the life and reign of David is detailed for us in 1-2 Samuel, they mention details that we know existed during that time. The Philistines were wiped out by the Babylonians in the 6th Century BC, which means they still were around 400 years before that during David’s time. The same is true for the Amalekites who disappeared from the world scene in the 5th Century BC. The cities of Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Ziklag, and Gath all are either still standing today or fit the descriptions given to them when discovered exactly where the Bible claimed they would be. The names of other kings like Achish, Saul, and others give us no reason to think these are fictional characters interacting with historical people. The most significant of which is the mention of Ahimelech who served as priest during the historical days of the High Priest Abiathar according to none other than Jesus Himself. (Mark 2:26)
2. Support from Archeology: Discoveries were made in Tel-Dan by Professor Avraham Biran of a victory pillar that dates around 100 years after David’s time. This pillar included a mention of the Dynasty of David being overcome by the Syrians. You would think that an enemy of Israel would know whether or not this family existed after defeating them in battle and setting up a sign to gloat about it.
3. Embarrassing Details: When making up a story about Israel’s greatest king, you’d expect the author to embellish and glorify their fictional character to the point of absurdity like we see with the other kings of ancient history. The problem is that we are told more details that you wouldn’t make up about a hero and king then anything you could consider exaggeration. A man after God’s own heart is acknowledged in these same sources as a polygamist violating God’s law for kings in the Torah, a murderer and liar regarding the incident with Bathsheba, and even a mercenary who lived with the Philistines towards the end of Saul’s reign. We are also given very embarrassing details about his heirs. His firstborn son is reported to have raped one of his daughters. Another one of his heirs murders his brother for the act and enacts a coup de tat against his father. These are not the sort of things you make up about someone held in such high stature in Jewish and Christian circles even to this day. For these reasons, we have no reason to believe by any historical standard that David is a fictional character. The Bible isn’t just a book of history, but it records history in a way that can be tested. John 3:12: “If I tell you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you about Heavenly things?”

A Reason For Hope is a ministry of Calvary Christian Fellowship of Tucson

Listen: Monday – Friday 5-6pm, on 106.3FM Reach Radio

Email your questions:

questionsforhope@gmail.com

Follow Twitter: @ScottR4H

Follow on CCF Facebook: facebook.com/ccftucson
Watch our Frequently Asked Questions on GodTube or YouTube.

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week – 1/4/2020

Question of the Week: How do I combat sin if I only seem to be getting worse?

Paul said in the Book of Romans Chapter 13 and verse 14 that we should put on the Lord Jesus Christ and make no provision for the flesh to fulfill its lusts. In practice, this means we need to recognize where our struggles come from and cut them off at the pass before they have a chance to dominate our lives. For those that struggle with internet pornography, take advantage of internet filters. For those that struggle with alcohol, keep your finances in the hands of people (spouses or family members) who can go with you when you need to buy groceries. For those that struggle with relationships, be willing to cut off those influences in your life. If something stands between you and Jesus, a serious question needs to be asked if it should be removed. There are areas we will always struggle in and can only be removed from our lives to a certain point. Our responsibility as Christians is to proactively pursue a closer relationship with our Lord. If this means the loss of certain things in our lives, so be it. If the result is more of Him in our hearts, the sin that so easily ensnares us will sort itself out.

A Reason For Hope is a ministry of Calvary Christian Fellowship of Tucson

Listen: Monday – Friday 5-6pm, on 106.3FM Reach Radio

Email your questions:

questionsforhope@gmail.com

Follow Twitter: @ScottR4H

Follow on CCF Facebook: facebook.com/ccftucson
Watch our Frequently Asked Questions on GodTube or YouTube.

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week – 12/20/2019

Question of the Week: Will God send someone to Hell if they have been sealed with the Holy Spirit?

In order to properly understand the role the Holy Spirit plays in our salvation, it’s important to understand what we have actually been saved from and the cultural references Paul uses to describe it. In the book of Ephesians, chapter 4 and verse 30, Paul says through inspiration of the Holy Spirit that we should not grieve the Holy Spirit, whom we were sealed with for the day of redemption. There are two key details here to understand. First, what we have been redeemed from. And second, what it means to seal something in the context the church of Ephesus would have understood.
Hell is described a variety of ways in scripture, but all are emphasizing the point that it is a state you do not want to find yourself in. God is the source of everything good and perfect. Those who reject a personal relationship with Him won’t be forced to be with Him forever. This alternative is known as Hell. Along with the righteous judgment of sin, it is what we all want apart from the Holy Spirit’s direct intervention in our hearts to make us aware of our need for a Savior in the first place.
The salvation of our souls, referred to as being sealed with the Holy Spirit, is something the port-city of Ephesus would have been familiar with. Seeing a lot of cargo in and out of their city, they were identified as the property of a particular company or individual based on the wax seal imprinted on the shipment. Regardless of the state the cargo was in, or what kind of cargo it was, the seal was the only thing they were concerned about that decided where it was going to go.
Therefore, if you have been sealed with the Holy Spirit then you belong to God. If you belong to God, then He won’t separate you from Himself forever.

A Reason For Hope is a ministry of Calvary Christian Fellowship of Tucson

Listen: Monday – Friday 5-6pm, on 106.3FM Reach Radio

Email your questions:

questionsforhope@gmail.com

Follow Twitter: @ScottR4H

Follow on CCF Facebook: facebook.com/ccftucson
Watch our Frequently Asked Questions on GodTube or YouTube.

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week – 12/13/2019

Question of the Week: Is the Bible’s stance on homosexuality misunderstood?

When it comes to any area of controversy, there are always three kinds of responses; compromise, overcorrection, and truth. The position of compromise when it comes to homosexuality usually goes to passages like Romans 1:26-27 and 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 and clarifies that the statements are taken out of context and the focus is only on the topic of judging one other. They will also look at passages like Leviticus 18 and claim that it only applied to Israel and God is doing a new work of sanctification in our day like Acts and the Gentiles. Then they will take passages like Genesis 19 and Judges 19 and clarify the sin was in rape, not necessarily homosexual practice. For those taking notes, you’ve probably noticed that this is a lot to redefine in order to make a solid case about the Bible’s stance about a particular issue.
1. There is not a single case of a positive homosexual relationship in the entirety of scripture without reading into the text a sexual relationship that you wouldn’t get from a plain reading. Examples: 1 Samuel 18:1, 2 Samuel 1:26, Matthew 8:5-13, etc.
2. There is no consistent form of context that could be presented for Romans 1 and 1 Corinthians 6 that would make anything Paul mentions in both lists somehow righteous in God’s eyes if practiced the right way. Examples: Extortion, Adultery, Theft, Rebellion against God, Idolatry, etc.
3. The attempt to make peace at the cost of truth cuts both ways. If the Bible isn’t clear on what is sin, then the Bible isn’t clear on what we salvation from. Likewise, if the Bible defines sin, we need to treat all sin the same way. Heterosexual immorality is just as much sexual immorality as any other form. It isn’t the unforgivable sin, but still is a sin that needs to be forgiven.
Justification of sin through compromise is allowing the culture to redefine our Bibles. It is wrong. Likewise, overinflating one form of sexual immorality above all others is just as much a mishandling of the Biblical text. Therefore, we need to stick to scripture if we care about God’s standards for our sexuality. These were defined for us in Genesis 2:24, Matthew 19:5, and Ephesians 5:31. If they don’t know the God who defined those standards for us, then make sure they aren’t getting the cart before the horse. An unsaved soul that is sexually moral is still in need of a Savior. We shouldn’t expect non-Christians to have Christian standards. Christians, however, should have Christian standards.

A Reason For Hope is a ministry of Calvary Christian Fellowship of Tucson

Listen: Monday – Friday 5-6pm, on 106.3FM Reach Radio

Email your questions:

questionsforhope@gmail.com

Follow Twitter: @ScottR4H

Follow on CCF Facebook: facebook.com/ccftucsonWatch our Frequently Asked Questions on GodTube or YouTube.

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, May 3rd, 2019

What are the pro’s and con’s of the Hebrew Roots Movement?

Like most Christian movements, there’s people in the Hebrew Roots who start with something good and take it too far.
The good that the Hebrew Roots Movement starts with is a desire to not neglect 2/3rds of their Bibles and understand the full counsel of God’s word. The name Hebrew Roots is a desire to make sure we know what Bible Jesus was reading when He fulfilled every promise in it.
The problem is when they either make the same mistake in the opposite direction and abandon the New Testament entirely, or start treating others and themselves as if they were under the Old Covenant. This not only results in serious misrepresentation of both Covenants made to Israel and the World through Christ, but also makes the mistake the author of Hebrews warned his audience about in settling for a shadow of Christ when we have the substance of everything the Old Testament points us to.
At best, it’s not settling for less when hearing the full counsel of God’s word. At worst, it settles for less than what Jesus provided us in having a right relationship with God through His mercy.

A Reason For Hope is a ministry of Calvary Christian Fellowship of Tucson

Listen: Monday – Friday 5-6pm, on 106.3FM Reach Radio

Email your questions:

questionsforhope@gmail.com

Follow Twitter: @ScottR4H

Follow on CCF Facebook: facebook.com/ccftucsonWatch our Frequently Asked Questions on GodTube or YouTube.

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, April 26th, 2019

What does Hebrews chapter 1 have to say about angels?

Angels, or literally messengers, are described throughout the Bible with three very consistent rules about them.
1. They are not physical beings. The can appear as such if it is appropriate, but they do their best work under cover.
2. They are not our masters or slaves. They serve God the same way we do, but in the capacity they were created to.
3. They are not Jesus. Angels worship Jesus. Angels don’t share God’s authority and status. Angels were created at a point in time.
Angels are amazing creatures, but they can’t hold a candle to the one who created us both. And it’s on Him our attention should be focused.

A Reason For Hope is a ministry of Calvary Christian Fellowship of Tucson

Listen: Monday – Friday 5-6pm, on 106.3FM Reach Radio

Email your questions:

questionsforhope@gmail.com

Follow Twitter: @ScottR4H

Follow on CCF Facebook: facebook.com/ccftucsonWatch our Frequently Asked Questions on GodTube or YouTube.

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, April 12th, 2019

If the gift of tongues can be a private prayer language to God, why is the gift of interpretation also necessary?

The gift of tongues is like any other spiritual gift. It’s given for a reason. It’s purpose is given in God’s word. And it’s source is God Himself. Tongues is no exception. However, before we discuss what tongues is, we have to clarify what it isn’t. The mental condition known as “Glossolalia” is where someone is whipped up into such a mental frenzy that they start spouting off random words without being aware of it. That is not or ever has been what the Bible calls the gift of Tongues. There are two separate kinds of uses for this spiritual gift that requires two different things in order for it to actually be Tongues as the Bible defines it. You are speaking with the intention to communicate in a language you don’t know. If it’s in prayer, Paul clarifies to the Corinthian church that an interpretation will always accompany it or it will serve no purpose. Likewise, when the gift of tongues was practiced outside the church to non-believers in the book of Acts, everyone listening understood the language as their own and understood every word. Either way, a legitimate use gift of tongues will always include an interpretation.

A Reason For Hope is a ministry of Calvary Christian Fellowship of Tucson

Listen: Monday – Friday 5-6pm, on 106.3FM Reach Radio

Email your questions:

questionsforhope@gmail.com

Follow Twitter: @ScottR4H

Follow on CCF Facebook: facebook.com/ccftucsonWatch our Frequently Asked Questions on GodTube or YouTube.

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, April 5th, 2019

Does the Bible show Jesus supports Abortion in Revelation 2:23?

The question itself is inflammatory rather than looking for a genuine answer, but one will be provided nonetheless.
The passage reads; “And to the angel of the church in Thyatira write, ‘These things says the Son of God, who has eyes like a flame of fire, and His feet like fine brass: “I know your works, love, service, faith, and your patience; and as for your works, the last are more than the first.Nevertheless I have a few things against you, because you allow that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess, to teach and seduce My servants to commit sexual immorality and eat things sacrificed to idols.And I gave her time to repent of her sexual immorality, and she did not repent. Indeed I will cast her into a sickbed, and those who commit adultery with her into great tribulation, unless they repent of their deeds.I will kill her children with death, and all the churches shall know that I am He who searches the minds and hearts. And I will give to each one of you according to your works.
There are several things to note in the passage in order to understand why the question can’t be genuine. First, Jesus is speaking to a church in Asia Minor that had allowed false prophets to influence their behavior in a way that directly rebelled against Him. The false prophets themselves were going to be held accountable, and if the church didn’t turn from their false teachings, they would join them. That is as plain as the passage could possibly be taken. Narrowing in on the passage that says, “I will kill her children with death” only worsens their argument. People who argue for abortion do so hoping to prove that it’s moral to do so. Yet if we allow that this passage is speaking of the unborn or newborn, it calls it killing and causing the death of children. That doesn’t help their case. This is what then solidifies our own. Whose children are they? 3 verses prior, Jezebel is mentioned. Queen Jezebel, the wife of King Ahab of Samaria, was a historical human being who lived 800 years before Jesus and one decade short of 900 years before the writing of this book. Unless we believe that the Bible was inaccurate in reporting Jehu having her thrown out a window to be eaten alive by dogs, and she somehow managed to survive for almost a millennium to influence this church, she’s a symbol for her legacy of introducing and enforcing Baal worship in Israel and murdering the people who stood in her way. If the mother is a symbol, it’s reasonable to conclude that her children are as well. It is almost as unwise to read the last book of the Bible before being familiar with the first 65, as it is to take the objections of internet atheists seriously.

A Reason For Hope is a ministry of Calvary Christian Fellowship of Tucson

Listen: Monday – Friday 5-6pm, on 106.3FM Reach Radio

Email your questions:

questionsforhope@gmail.com

Follow Twitter: @ScottR4H

Follow on CCF Facebook: facebook.com/ccftucsonWatch our Frequently Asked Questions on GodTube or YouTube.

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, March 29th, 2019

How do we come to the conclusion that when the Bible mentions the “Angel of the LORD” it is referring to an appearance of God the Son before His incarnation?

The key to interpreting anything in the Bible is three-fold, pun intended. First, Context. Second, Consistency. And third, Clarity. When coming across passages that mention the Angel of the LORD, we need to examine the passage with these three principals in mind like we would in any work of writing. What do the verses leading up to and following the passage tell us about who is talking? Would interpreting the passage that way negatively affect other key truths in the Bible as a whole? Does the literal sense make sense? Let’s look at three examples to see this in practice.
In the book of Genesis chapter 22, we see the third verse mention God telling Abraham to offer his only beloved son on a specific mountain as a sacrifice. When the Angel of the Lord appears right before Abraham is about to obey God’s command, He stops the knife and repeats to Abraham the promise God made to Him in Genesis 12 as now official. And even more so, The Angel of the LORD tells Abraham that this is going to be the case because he obeyed His voice. Who told Abraham to offer his son again? The Angel of the LORD or God? It’s almost as if this passage is stating they are one in the same.
In the book of Judges, the soon-to-be mother of Sampson is praying to God for a child. This is noteworthy given the spiritual state Israel was in during this time in their history. The Angel of the Lord comes to her and her husband with a positive answer on one condition. The child they are to bring into this world is to keep the Nazarite Vow for his entire life. Then in reaction to this messenger, Judges chapter 13 and verse 22 states that they have seen God. No further encounters apart from the Angel of the LORD took place in the chapter, and if this claim was incorrect we have several examples in the book of Revelation where angels who were incorrectly treated as God take the time to immediately correct the person who is worshipping them. Since both Manoah and his wife both affirm this Angel of the LORD as God and aren’t corrected, could it be that they were in fact correct?
In the gospel according to Matthew, Jesus has physically incarnated as a human baby with his earthly parents. An Angel of the LORD appears to Joseph in a dream and warns him that Herod is going to try to kill the child. As per his instructions, they flee to Egypt until the tyrant’s death and escape a major tragedy predicted in the book of Jeremiah. The Angel of the LORD doesn’t make any claims about himself that are comparable to God, isn’t treated or regarded as God by Joseph, and obviously wasn’t Jesus Himself since He was now currently limiting Himself by adopting human nature.
Other examples can be given. The Commander of the Army of the LORD appears to Joshua and accepts worship. Daniel sees a vision of a Glorious Man, but the Angel who delivers the message clarifies that he is named Gabriel and not YHVH. The Angel that accompanied Moses and Israel through the Wilderness had God’s name in Him. Etc. The passages are plainly understood that when an Angel claims the sort of things only God could rightly claim, He’s either truly representing Himself as God or He’s no angel of God. Only someone with a prior agenda would try to spin the passages another way to dismiss what is plainly being said.

A Reason For Hope is a ministry of Calvary Christian Fellowship of Tucson

Listen: Monday – Friday 5-6pm, on 106.3FM Reach Radio

Email your questions:

questionsforhope@gmail.com

Follow Twitter: @ScottR4H

Follow on CCF Facebook: facebook.com/ccftucsonWatch our Frequently Asked Questions on GodTube or YouTube.

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, March 22nd, 2019

Is it true that Esther was betrothed to Mordecai rather than simply related to him as the Old Testament text says in English?

When someone claims that there is a major difference between the original Hebrew and the modern English translations, this is usually the best they have to offer when asked to give an example. There is no passage in scripture that couldn’t be understood in its proper context without an understanding of the original languages. With that said, the claim that Esther was bethrothed to Mordecai rather than simply adopted by him is an assumption made by the tradition that since Esther was orphaned, it would have been possible that Mordecai took him into his family through marriage. This however, is not a detail we are given or conclusion we’d come to from the text alone. It is nothing more than a deviation from the main point. The Amalekites continued to be a threat to Israel going all the way back to Exodus, and now they were going to be dealt with forever through Esther. Looking beyond the bible for rabbit trails that lead to shaky, if not outright false, conclusions are only going to end up wasting your time.

A Reason For Hope is a ministry of Calvary Christian Fellowship of Tucson

Listen: Monday – Friday 5-6pm, on 106.3FM Reach Radio

Email your questions:

questionsforhope@gmail.com

Follow Twitter: @ScottR4H

Follow on CCF Facebook: facebook.com/ccftucsonWatch our Frequently Asked Questions on GodTube or YouTube.

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week – February 7th, 2020

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, January 31st, 2020

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week – January 24th, 2020

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week – January 17th, 2020

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week – 1/10/2020

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week – 1/4/2020

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week – 12/20/2019

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week – 12/13/2019

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, May 3rd, 2019

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, April 26th, 2019

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, April 12th, 2019

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, April 5th, 2019

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, March 29th, 2019

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, March 22nd, 2019

A Reason for Hope Question of the Week, March 22nd, 2019

Prince Road Location

Service Times

Office Hours of Operation

Meet our Pastor

What We Believe

watch & Listen Live!

Latest Tweets